Previous Events
|
2010
Cheltenham Science Festival
Carbon Trading
12:15 - 1:15pm, Thursday 10 June 2010
Could carbon trading be the solution for cutting emissions?
The idea is that a cap on total emissions is set and reduced
each year. High polluters must either reduce emissions or buy
credits from low-carbon businesses, which use the extra income
to make their greener technology more financially viable.
But how can we reliably measure emissions and can it really work?
Caspar Hewett
discusses the issues
with Mark Maslin, Director of the UCL Environment Institute,
and Tony Grayling from the Environment Agency.
Global Water Security
4 - 5pm, Thursday 10 June 2010
Water security is one of the biggest challenges facing humanity.
More than one third of the world’s population now lives in
water-stressed areas, and in the fight for this precious commodity,
regional ‘water wars’ are threatening stability.
Engineer Roger Falconer, geographer Richard Taylor and
governance specialist Sue Cavill discuss with
Caspar Hewett,
Director of The Great Debate,
how the planet’s plentiful supply of water can be fairly distributed.
2030: Engineering Our Climate
6 - 7.15pm, Thursday 10th June
Imagine it is 2030. Regrettably, global carbon emissions
targets have been missed and geoengineering techniques –
to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere or to block the
Sun’s energy – may be the only option to prevent global
temperatures from rising. Can you decide the way forward?
Caspar Hewett
guides you through the expert advice from engineer Stephen Salter,
biogeochemist Richard Lampitt, and Professor of International Law
Catherine Redgwell.
Members book group: Robert Winston
4 - 5pm, Friday 11 June 2010
Exclusive event for Cheltenham Festival members. Share your views
in a discussion of
Bad Ideas?,
exploring its themes of human creative endeavour and
uninentional consequences, with the author Robert Winston
and Caspar Hewett.
The Great Debate@EGU
Getting Real About Energy
in association with RCE North East
European Geosciences
Union General Assembly 2010
3:30pm, Thursday 6th May 2010
Vienna, Austria
Convened by Caspar Hewett,
Paul Quinn and Mark Wilkinson
In the context of climate change the discussion of
energy provision is focused increasingly on renewables,
but how realistic a proposition is it for renewables to
provide the energy we need? Nuclear is touted by many
as an alternative, yet the problem of waste is far from
being solved. So when and how are we to come up with a
rational energy policy for the next fifty years? What
are the real issues and how do we overcome the barriers
we face today?
Chair: Dr Paul Quinn,
Newcastle University
Speakers:
Dermot Roddy,
Science City Professor of Energy, Newcastle upon Tyne,
Director, Sir Joseph Swan
Institute for Energy Research;
Hervé Coutrix,
Vice President Geosciences Structural and Sedimentological studies, TOTAL;
Niel Bowerman,
co-founder and former Executive Director,
Climatico,
co-founder, The Climate Justice Project
Video of proceedings
The Great Debate and
North East Centre for Lifelong
Learning present
The Great Debate: Humans in a Changing Climate
Getting
Real About Climate Change
in association with RCE North East
Saturday, 20th March 2010,
Newcastle University
Sponsored by
Economic and Social Research Council
One day workshop on the theme of how humanity should respond
to climate change. This exciting day included
active debates open to all and a video-making workshop
for young people with a thirst for cutting edge documentaries.
Getting Real About Climate Change encouraged
participants to take a critical look at the
current discussions surrounding the feasibility of geoengineering,
the effects climate change on
food and water security and energy generation,
and contribute to a video of the day's proceedings.
Our young participants had the opportunity
to gain hands-on experience in film-making, working both
behind and in front of the camera.
More ...
Speakers included
Tony Allan,
Stockholm Water Prize Laureate 2008, founder of
London University's Water Issues Group;
Greg
Bankoff, environmental historian, University of Hull,
Jennie Barron,
research fellow in water management at
Stockholm Environment Institute;
Julia Brown,
lecturer in Environmental Policy, Planning and Management,
University of Portsmouth;
Ben Campbell,
social anthropologist, Durham University;
Steve Caseley,
Director of Distributed Energy,
New and Renewable Energy Centre;
Tim Foxon,
academic research fellow at
Sustainability Research Institute, Leeds;
Joanna Haigh,
professor of atmospheric physics, Imperial College, contributor to
the recent Royal Society report,
Geoengineering the climate;
Phil Macnaghten,
founding Director of Institute
of Hazard and Risk Research, Durham University;
Rob Williams,
Renewables Projects Director, Banks Developments.
Full details
The Great Debate:
Humans in a Changing Climate
in association with North East Centre for Lifelong
Learning
Five Thursdays from 4th February 2010
Part of the Explore programme
The world we live in today is one that is rapidly changing.
A major element of this is the almost universally accepted
global increase in temperature. How reliable is our understanding
of the future climate if we are to plan for the future? This short
discussion-based course will look at the history of climate
modelling, ask what we can and cannot deduce from current models
and reflect on what that means for people today and in the future.
The issues raised by climate change will be examined through
discussions on water resources, food and energy production.
The ramifications of the recent interest in geoengineering –
controlling the climate through intentional manipulation -
will be explored. The programme will consist of five sessions
each with an introduction followed by discussion.
Week 1 (4 Feb): Introduction by Dr Caspar Hewett. How the media
treat climate change issues. How can we read between the lines?
Week 2 (11 Feb):
Dr Stephen Blenkinsop,
Newcastle University, tells us about what climate change can
and cannot tell us.
Week 3 (18 Feb):
Dr Richard Dawson,
Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, talks about the
challenges of adapting cities to address a changing climate.
Week 4 (25 Feb):
Dr Annie Borland,
Moorbank Botanical Garden, on what the biological
sciences can do for us.
Week 5 (4 March):
Review with Caspar Hewett
The Climate e-mail Row:
What does it tell us about science?
12:30, Wednesday 24 February
Newcastle Arts Centre
Westgate Road
Controversy and recriminations surround the ‘hacking’
of emails relating to climate change research. But what the does
the political and public reaction tell us about our society thinks
science does and ought to work? Introduced by Caspar Hewett.
Part of the Explore programme
Lunchtime Perspectives: Behind the News
series
'It's the end of the world as we know it
(and I feel fine): Why environmentalism has failed
and what comes next.'
Paul Kingsnorth
5.30pm, 22nd February 2010
Beehive, Room 2.21. Newcastle University.
Paul Kingsnorth,
author, One No, Many Yeses,
Real England,
has been a peace observer in Mexico, a floor-sweeper in McDonalds
and a history student at Oxford University. He was arrested
during the Twyford Down road protests in the 1990s and was named one of
Britain's 'top ten troublemakers' by
New Statesman in 2001.
He has worked on the comment desk of
The Independent,
as commissioning editor for opendemocracy.net
and as deputy editor of The
Ecologist. He is also an award-winning poet,
and an honorary member of the Lani tribe of
New Guinea.
At this seminar Paul presented a version of his contribution to the book
What is Radical Politics Today?
edited by Jonathan Pugh of Newcastle University,
and published in November 2009 by Palgrave-Macmillan.
This event is linked to the
Space of Democracy
and the Democracy of Space network.
For further information e-mail
Jonathan Pugh
Children and Cities
Ken Worpole
5.30pm, 1st February 2010
Beehive, Room 2.21. Newcastle University.
After the Second World War, architects, planners and politicians
across Europe privileged the role of the child in the city.
Yet today one or more children on the street is considered a
social problem in the making. How did we get to this impasse
and how can we get out of it?
At this seminar
Ken Worpole
was presenting a version of his contribution to the book
What is Radical Politics Today?
edited by Jonathan Pugh of Newcastle University,
and published in November 2009 by Palgrave-Macmillan.
This event is linked to the
Space of Democracy
and the Democracy of Space network.
For further information contact
Jonathan Pugh
Top of page
1998 1999
2000 2001
2002 2003
2004 2005
2006 2007
2008 2010
|
|
2009
Water, Water Everywhere?
June 5th
Don’t
Shout at the Telly, Change What's on it!, March 14th
The
“Credit Crunch”: Consequences for UK Households, March 11th

Water, Water Everywhere?
6:30 pm, Friday 5th June 2009
Cheltenham Town Hall
Part of Cheltenham
Science Festival
Some argue there is no excuse for water shortages in a water-rich
nation like Britain, and that we should build ambitious new
infrastructures such as a ‘national
grid’ for water. Others think we should be curbing demand to
minimise our impact on the environment. Water engineer and chair of
The Great Debate,
Caspar Hewett and
Bruce Horton, environmental adviser
for Water UK, join Trevor Bishop from the
Environment Agency and Jonathon Porritt to discuss
the future of hydrating the nation.
present
Don’t Shout at the Telly, Change What's on it!
Saturday, 14 March 2009
Newcastle University
One day workshop organised by The Great Debate and
WORLDwrite
focussing on documentary making, the role of the media, and
environmental issues. This exciting day will engage with topics
through film showings, discussion and a news-making workshop:
Thought provoking debates will interrogate inconvenient
untruths about climate change, explore the influence of the
media, and examine activism in the noughties.
With:
Hilaire Agnama,
Teesside
One World Centre
Paul
Chatterton, Leeds University
Ceri
Dingle - Director of
WORLDwrite
and Chew on it Productions
Caspar
Hewett, environmental consultant,
Chair of The Great Debate
Alex
Lockwood, Sunderland University
Kate
Manzo, Newcastle University
Alison
Neilson, author
Disrupting Privilige, Identity, and Meaning: A Reflective Dance of
Environmental Education
Viv
Regan, Assistant Director, Producer,
WORLDwrite
Nathalie Rothschild, commissioning editor,
spiked-online
Click here for full details
Part of
The
Great Debate schools programme
The “Credit Crunch”: Consequences for UK Households
Wednesday, 11 March, 7-9 pm
Council Chambers, Newcastle City Council,
Civic Centre, Barras Bridge, NE99 2BN
The ‘credit crunch’ is already having material effects on households that will deepen in the coming months. Households are experiencing a reassessment of their creditworthiness that impacts on their capacity to access consumer credit at affordable rates of interest. Limitations on the availability of particular mortgage products and risk-adverse lending standards, combined with falling house prices, also create challenges for existing home-owners and would-be first-time buyers. Thus, in policy terms, new patterns of financial exclusion and the sustainability of home-ownership are crucial issues coming to the fore. Members of the public are invited to attend, raise questions and contribute to the debate.
Chaired by
Dr
Paul Langley, Northumbria University, this event will
feature a series of short contributions from recognized
experts in the field:
Professor Susan Smith, Durham University;
Professor Mark Stephens,
University of Glasgow; and
Dr Lavinia Mitton, University of Kent.
For further details please visit
The
“Credit Crunch” debate.
Event convened by Oliver Moss.
Top of page
1998 1999
2000 2001
2002 2003
2004 2005
2006 2007
2009 2010
|
| 2008
The Great Debate: What is radical politics today?
12.30-1.30pm, Friday, 5th December 2008
Fine Art Lecture Theatre,
Newcastle University
Part of the Newcastle University
public lecture series
Convened by Jonathan Pugh
Speakers:
Will Hutton, Chief Executive of The Work Foundation
Professor Lord Giddens, Member of the House of Lords
What is the nature of radical politics today?
How should we describe its character?
What is thought of as radical politics at this moment?
What is not? Why?
This debate is part of the What
is radical politics today? project.
The project explores the nature and character of radical
politics today, examines what it means to be engaged in
radical politics and explores how radical politics works
to shape and frame what we think of ourselves, issues and debates.
Initiated and directed by
Jonathan Pugh,
and including fifty of the worlds leading
commentators, the ongoing project is aiming to develop a sense
and feeling about the present nature and character of radical
politics. Click here for
further details.
Top of page
Flush it!
A film première hosted by
WORLDwrite and The Great Debate
Royal College of Art, London
2nd November 2008
Flush it! is a documentary aiming to put aspirations for
Western levels of water provision and sanitation on the map for
developing countries. The film interweaves concerns about local
water shortages, global water scarcity and toilet history with
aspirations for grand projects and excellent loos. Eritrean refugee
Tiba is at the centre of the film. Pontificating from her own bath
full of bubbles Tiba considers everything from depleted aquifers to
desalination to Livingstone’s plea not to flush. Tiba’s wet dream
informs us pit latrines stink, while experts help flush the crap and
remind us that water can never run out.
The documentary includes witness testimony from Dr Caspar Hewett,
researcher in water resources; James Woudhuysen, Professor of Forecasting
and Innovation at De Montfort University; Angela Lee, Exhibition Curator,
Gladstone Toilet Museum; Terry Woolliscroft, Customer Manager, Twyford
Bathrooms; James Heartfield, writer and lecturer; Robin Oakley, Senior
Climate Campaigner, Greenpeace UK; Tony Rachwal, Thames Water Research
& Development Director
The film’s première was followed by a question and answer session
with
Dr Caspar Hewett, Chair of The Great Debate and
Viv Regan, the film’s producer.
Click
here for full details of this session and the Battle of Ideas 2008
Click here
for Flush it! website
Top of page
Agents of Change? Darwinian Thought and Theories of
Human Nature Revisited
Sponsored by
School of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Northumbria
and
Edinburgh University Press
9am – 4pm, Saturday, 25th October 2008
Newcastle Business School
University of Northumbria at Newcastle
Darwinism or Darwinitis?
Key note speech by Raymond Tallis
author The Hand: A Philosophical Enquiry into Human Being
Chair: David O'Toole,
The Great Debate
Darwinism without Darwinitis:
text of talk with slides
The Great Human Nature Debate
For centuries philosophers and scientists have been trying to define what
constitutes human nature, yet this area of knowledge remains highly contested.
Some think that agency, the capacity to make choices and moral judgements, and to
act on them, lies at the heart of being human. For others it is our consciousness of our
selves that is the defining factor. Others still claim that free will, agency and
consciousness are illusions that are accidents of brain function. So, is
there a universal human nature? If so, what do we all have in common? What makes us
different from animals? Do the defining factors even exist?
Speakers:
Rita Carter, author Mapping the Mind,
Conciousness
Caspar Hewett, Director,
The Great Debate
Thomas Pink,
author The Psychology of Freedom, Free Will: A Very Short Introduction
Chair: Kevin
Yuill, Sunderland University
What can science tell us about human nature?
Modern developments in areas such as neuroscience, artificial intelligence
and evolutionary psychology have resulted in new ways of thinking about human
nature. Can we explain the mind and consciousness in terms of brain function?
Can we understand modern human behaviour in terms of our evolutionary heritage?
Is science even the right place to start if we want to understand human nature?
Speakers:
Igor Aleksander,
author The World in My Mind, How to Build a Mind
Bruce
Charlton,
author Psychiatry and the Human Condition
Kenan Malik, author Man, Beast and Zombie
Chair: Pauline Hadaway, Director,
Belfast Exposed
Come along, hear the arguments and have your say
Click here for full details
Top of page
Information-processing in Robotics, Biology and Philosophy:
Unnoticed Connections
Sponsored by
School of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Northumbria
7 – 8.30pm, Tuesday, 21st October 2008
Lecture Theatre CCE1 002
Newcastle Business School
University of Northumbria at Newcastle
What can biologists, roboticists and philosophers learn from one another?
What can computer science tell us about what biological systems do and how they
do it? Is it possible to replicate or model those chemical information-processing
functions in digital electronic computing systems? What are the implications of
recent developments in computer science and software engineering in understanding
the nature of causality?
Aaron Sloman, author of Computer
Revolution in Philosophy: Philosophy, Science and Models of Mind delves
into the world of connections between ideas developed in computer science, biology
and philosophy, providing new insights into some fundamental questions about the
nature of consciousness and free will.
Come along, hear the arguments and have your say
Speaker:
Aaron Sloman,
University of Birmingham
Chair:
Aidan
Burton, Newcastle University
Click here for full details
Top of page
Selfish Genes, Sex, and Sanity
Sponsored by
School of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Northumbria
7 – 8.30pm, Tuesday, 14th October 2008
Room CCE1 402 (4th Floor)
Newcastle Business School
University of Northumbria at Newcastle
What are the connections between mental illness and genetics?
Mental illnesses like autism and schizophrenia appear to have many
different causes, some of which are environmental and some seemingly genetic. In
this talk Christopher Badcock outlines
a new theory that seeks to
explain many of the facts in relation to conflict between genes
expressed from each parent's copy: so-called genomic imprinting. Not
only does this reveal the strange genetics involved in these illnesses
and the way environmental factors can mimic them, the new theory also
casts a revealing new light on what we take to be normality and has
far-reaching implications for our understanding of human nature.
Speaker:
Christopher Badcock, LSE
Related links:
Selfish genes, sex, and sanity:
Christopher Badcock outlines a new theory that resolves some long-standing
contradictions in explaining mental illness.
Selfish genes, sex, and sanity:
Slides from talk on 14 October 2008
Top of page
The Great Sustainable Energy Debate 2008
in association with
North East Forum for Climate Change Research (NEFCC)
7.30pm, Tuesday, 7th October 2008
Lecture Theatre CCE1-401 (TLT)
Newcastle Business School
University of Northumbria at Newcastle
Featuring:
Jim Skea,
Research Director, UK Energy Research Centre (UKERC)
Dermot
Roddy, Sir Joseph Swan Institute for Energy Research
Kate
Theobald, Sustainable Cities Research Institute
Chair: Professor Bob Evans
|
part of
|
In the context of both mounting anxiety over climate change and predictions that
the worldwide peak of hydrocarbon production will occur before 2021, the
North East is striving to become a global leader in the shift to a low-carbon energy
economy. Such transitions typically span decades - energy infrastructure takes years
to develop and new energy technologies are likely to take time to mature.
So, what are the prospects of seeing a widespread transition to a sustainable energy
economy? What are the barriers? What will be the main drivers of change?
How might the UK’s energy mix evolve over the next 40 years?
And what of demand management? What obligations do we have as citizen-consumers?
The
Great Sustainable Energy Debate 2008 proceedings by
Caspar Hewett
Top of page
The Complexity and Change Network in association with
The Great Debate and Newcastle Philosophy Society
present
Progress of the Human Mind: From Enlightenment to Postmodernism
9am – 4.30pm, Saturday, 27th September 2008
University of Northumbria at Newcastle
One day workshop examining the changing nature of society’s
understanding of the meaning of ‘progress’ and how it relates to the
way that humanity is perceived today. Thinkers discussed included
Condorcet, Kant, Saint-Simon, Auguste Comte and Michel Foucault.
Click here for further details.
Introduced by Caspar Hewett and
David Large.
Notes
Sketch of Condorcet's Sketch
by Caspar Hewett
Henri de Saint-Simon: The Great Synthesist
by Caspar Hewett
Auguste Comte – High Priest of Positivism
by Caspar Hewett
Prenotes by David Large
Summary and conclusions
by Caspar Hewett
Top of page
Developing World Challenges
9am - 4pm, Saturday, 15 March 2008
Lindisfarne Room, King's Road Centre, Newcastle University
part of the North East Education for
Sustainable Development Initiative
Sponsored by
Economic and Social Research Council and Newcastle University
One day workshop organised by The Great Debate and
WORLDwrite.
The workshop
focused on two new documentaries:
I'm A Subsistence Farmer... Get Me Out Of Here! and
Keeping Africa Small.
Speakers
Ceri Dingle, Director of WORLDwrite
and Chew on it Productions
Viv Regan, Producer, WORLDwrite and
Chew on it Productions
Kim Tan, Campaigns Officer for
Oxfam UK
Barry K.Gills,
Professor of Global Politics, Newcastle University
John Gowing,
Reader in Agricultural Water Management, Newcastle University
Bill Colwell, Atlantic Pictures
Hilaire Agnama, Development Education Worker
Click Here for full details
Top of page
Authority, Respect and Human Potential in the 21st Century
7:00 - 8:30pm, Monday, 21st January 2008
Devonshire Building, Newcastle University
The Great Debate opened its 10th Anniversary celebration
with a discussion exploring the themes of authority and human
potential, examining how they are linked to the erosion of respect in
modern society.
What is meant by authority, respect and human potential today? Since the
Enlightenment the idea of the subject has had a central place in the way
that we think about ourselves. This understanding of what it is to be
human rests on the idea that we are active agents who do things for
reasons and shape the world to our own ends. Yet in recent years this
view of human nature has become deeply unpopular and we are encouraged
to think of ourselves as objects at the mercy of outside forces. At the
same time something else seems to be contributing to this historical
moment; something that has been left unexplored by many thinkers. This
is the erosion of respect for authority, reflected in modern cynicism
about politics and a deep distrust of experts. How closely connected are
these changes and how are we to understand them?
Introduced by Dr Caspar Hewett
Top of page
|
|
The Great Debate continues to support the acclaimed debating competition for
sixth form students
As part of The Great Debate schools programme we hope to
involve more students in the region in public debate
through our continued support of the Institute of
Ideas' and Pfizer's Debating Matters Competition. Following
its highly successful pilot year, the competition launched in the North
East in 2005 and has continued to grow, attracting more and more schools
in the region. This year's regional heats saw Durham Johnstone Comprehensive
School (Durham), Ryton Comprehensive School (Ryton), St. Mary's Sixth
Form College (Newcastle) and
Whickham School (Whickham) make it through to the North East regional final
which took place at Newcastle University on Monday 28 April 2008.
Debating Matters demands more than rhetoric or rant from the sixth form students
who take part. Young people are encouraged to research issues thoroughly and become
more confident and sophisticated in articulating their views by standing up to a
probing intellectual examination. This is all part of the competition's philosophy
of privileging reasoned participation over rhetorical posturing.
Debate topics engage with contentious contemporary issues and uniquely involve a
critical examination of debater's arguments by celebrity judges drawn from the fields
of academia, the media and business.
The Great Debate's Caspar Hewett,
Dave O'Toole, Jon Pugh
and Mo Lovatt have been judges in the competition.
Click here
for further details about the competition
1998 1999
2000 2001
2002 2003
2004 2005
2006 2008
2009 2010
Top of page
|
|
ESRC Festival of Social Science
The Great Land Use Debate
7 - 14 March 2008
The following on line debate may be of interest to vistors to The Great Debate
web site: RELU Great Land Use Debate
What is our rural land for and what do we expect from it?
Should farmers be diversifying into energy crops or concentrating on feeding
the nation? And is it reasonable to expect them to be competitive food businesses
as well as managers and guardians of wildlife and landscapes? When floods overwhelm
urban areas should that just be a problem for the individuals and businesses affected?
Or should country dwellers be prepared to sacrifice rural land for flood storage?
Everyone seems to want something different, but can rural land fulfil all of
these expectations? What is our long term vision for land use in the UK and do
we need an extension of the planning system from town into countryside in order
to realise it?
The UK research councils’ Rural Economy and Land Use Programme
invited
contributions to a unique on-line debate during
National Science and Engineering
Week/Festival of Social Science 2008.
The Programme’s land use policy analysts
will be posed some key questions to draw in opinion
from a wide range of
contributors, see the RELU
website.
Top of page
|
|
2007
The Great Debate: The New Politics of Climate Change
Part of
The
Space of Democracy and the Democracy of Space
programme
Monday 25th June, 5.30pm
Bedson Teaching Centre, Newcastle University
Hosted by Dr Jonathan Pugh
Chair: Prof Phil Powrie,
Dean of Research for the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences,
Newcastle University
Speakers:
Prof Steve Rayner,
Director of the James Martin Institute (University of Oxford);
Director of the ESRC's ~£5m Science in Society Programme;
Member of the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution,
the Oxford Commission on Sustainable Consumption and a lead author on the
Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Dr
Joe Smith, School of Social Sciences (Open University);
Director of the ESRC/NERC/BBC/NEF-sponsored
Interdependence Day project
Prof
Phil Macnaghten, Department of Geography (Durham University);
Director of the Institute of Hazard and Risk Research (IHRR); Honorary
Professor in the Institute for Advanced Studies at Lancaster University;
Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts, and Senior Associate of Demos
Prof Jim Hall,
Professor of Earth Systems Engineering, Newcastle University, advisor to the Stern
Review on the Economics of Climate Change, contributing
author to Assessment Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
All Planned Out:
The Worldwide Impact of the British Town and Country Planning System
The Building Centre, 26 Store Street, London WC1E 7BT
18-19 May 2007
Caspar Hewett chaired debates on
Who is the town and the countryside for? and
Where to for planning? and Jon Pugh
chaired the debate on
Finding the public in the British planning process at
All Planned Out conference in London
The 3rd Workshop on Development, Sustainability and Environment
Sponsored by
Economic and Social Research Council
and Newcastle Science Festival
Saturday, 17th March 2007, 9am-4pm
Newcastle University
At the opening of the 21st century concern for the environment influences
policy throughout the world.
Any discussion about resources is infused with the
language of sustainability. What does this mean for the developed and
developing worlds? Is our current pattern of water use
sustainable? How are we going to generate sufficient electricity for our future needs?
Is the sort of technology we take for granted in the West appropriate for
the developing world?
Combining a workshop on Film training with a global edge,
documentary footage from Africa and a series of
discussions this one day workshop examined a series of issues related to
Development, Sustainability and Environment through debates on three key themes:
Water Resources and the Future with Caspar Hewett,
Dr Hayley Fowler, Ray Heslop
Energy Generation in the new millenium with
Steven Harrison and Mark Wilkinson
Thinking Big: Film Premiere and key note debate
with Daniel Ben Ami, Ceri Dingle and Michael Savage
Click Here for Proceedings of DSE3
Attendees included; Andrea Blatter
Bigging it up: The Great Megastructures Debate
Part of
Newcastle
Science Festival 2007
Thursday 15 March 2007
Discovery Museum,
Newcastle upon Tyne
Public debate on what sort of structures we want to create in the 21st century.
Speakers
Ian Abley, project manager,
audacity
John Thackara, design producer, Director of
Doors of Perception
Dr Sean Wilkinson, Structural Engineer,
Newcastle University
Proceedings of The Great Megastructures Debate
Reaching for the Sky review by Laura-Jay Turnbull
1998 1999
2000 2001
2002 2003
2004 2005
2007 2008
2009 2010
Top of page
|
|
2006
The Great Debate: Reprogramming Life
sponsored by Atlantic Books
Wednesday 6th December 2006
Institute for Research on Environment and Sustainability
Devonshire Building
Newcastle University
Location Map
Chair Caspar Hewett
What does it mean to reprogram the logic of life?
What are the implications of engineering nature's circuits?
The stuff of science fiction is now with us.
In 1994, after forty years of promises, scientists announced the coming of the world's
first molecular computer. Since then millions have been invested in molecular computing
and synthetic biology research. DNA, the code of life, now sits at the heart of
experimental computers in labs around the world. Hybrid machines integrate living cells
with silicon nanotubes and preparations are being made to create entirely new
organisms, never seen before.
How can humanity benefit from this revolutionary new technology?
What are the dangers? What are the ethical implications?
Speakers:
Martyn Amos, author Genesis Machines:
The New Science of Biocomputing
Professor
John Burn, Institute of Human Genetics
Click here to print details of this event
To Build or Not to Build? The Great Housing Debate
sponsored by
7pm, Thursday 30th November 2006
Institute for Research on Environment and Sustainability
Newcastle University
Chair Caspar Hewett
There is a crisis in housing in the UK. Demand for housing far outstrips availability,
fuelling ever increasing house prices. So where are we to go from here? What are the
barriers to providing housing for all at the beginning of the 21st century? James
Heartfield, author of Let’s Build, thinks it is time
we committed to a huge
building programme over the next decade, rejecting the scare stories about
the environment, about suburbia and about social cohesion. How realistic is this?
Come along, hear the arguments and have your say.
Speakers:
James
Heartfield,
author Let's Build: Why We Need Five Million New Homes
in the Next Ten Years
Dr Zan
Gunn,
Lecturer in Town Planning, Newcastle University
Dominic Coupe,
Campaign to Protect Rural England
Click here for proceedings
The Great Debate:
Post-Territorial Governance and Anti-politics
Convened by Jon Pugh and Caspar Hewett
Friday 19th May 2006
Newcastle University
Devonshire Building, G21/22
Chair: Jon Pugh
Bringing together leading academics from London, Newcastle and Lancaster, this
debate will explore the nature of post-territorial governance in the modern era.
Particular attention will be given to what have become known as ‘anti-political’
movements – those movements which are not accountable to territorial states; those
movements which seek political influence through reference to global ethical
principles, rather than through the accountability of mass party politics. What do
such movements tell us about the nature of the political in the modern era? Are they
a positive or negative development? And how are they reflective of what is being
called a ‘de-territorialised’ era?
These and other questions will be the focus of the debate between:
The Great Debate: Politics of Fear
An Audience with Frank Furedi
Sponsored by Newcastle University
6.30pm, Monday 24th April 2006
LG38, Bedson Teaching Centre
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Map
Do the terms "left" and "right" mean anything today?
Is it really satisfactory to reduce all our political debate to these two terms?
Professor Frank Furedi discusses his new book, Politics
of Fear: Beyond Left and Right, arguing that contemporary and recent developments
have created the need for a new conception of politics with an adequate conception of
humanity - one that "remoralises" politics by taking humans seriously, recognises the
centrality of morality and discussions of right and wrong, and utilises our
imaginations. He proposes a new, and inevitably controversial, humanist politics to
escape the trap of 20th century political ideology.
The Great Debate: Science and the Human Potential
Part of Newcastle Science Festival 2006
Sponsored by Newcastle University
Saturday 18th March 2006
Rooms LG35/37, Bedson Teaching Centre
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Tutors: Caspar Hewett and
Jon Pugh
Do humans really have a special place in nature?
What do the notions of progress and humanism have to offer us today?
This day school examined the development of ideas about the human
potential and the changing notion of progress from the Scientific
Revolution through to the present. The scientific method and its
influence on the Enlightenment was discussed and the way that
the notions of progress, equality and the centrality of humanity
have changed over the centuries was explored through a study of
key thinkers including Darwin and 'The Three Cs' - Copernicus, Condorcet and Comte.
Modern schools of thought such as Postmodernism and
how they relate to humanist ideas were discussed through
a study of Derrida, Foucault and Deleuze.
Print details for this event
The Three Cs and the Notion of Progress:
Copernicus, Condorcet, Comte
by Caspar J M Hewett, Notes from the day school
Top of page
The Great Energy Debate
Part of Newcastle Science Festival 2006
In association with Institute for Research on Environment and Sustainability
7:00 - 8:30 pm, Wednesday 15th March 2006
Discovery Museum,
Great Hall
Chair: Dave O'Toole
Why does the debate over how we should generate our power continue
to divide opinion? The EU has set a target for renewable energy of
22 per cent by 2010 but moves to build wind farms continue to meet
opposition in the UK. Germany is already the world's largest wind
power producer but the news that the German parliament has approved
plans to double the country’s 15000 turbines over the next 16 years
has been met with angry protests. Increasingly there is a push, even
from noted environmentalists, to expand the use of nuclear power to
help meet targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. So what is
the future of power generation?
with
Print details for this event
National Science Week 10-19 March 2006
Top of page
Galileo, Genetics and the Greens:
Perspectives on Scientific Thought
From January 25th 2006
Centre for Lifelong
Learning, Newcastle upon Tyne
Introduced by Caspar Hewett
Ten week course exploring the development of ideas about our relationship with
the natural world from the pre-Enlightenment to the crisis of belief in science towards
the end of the 20th century and the rise of postmodernism and environmentalism.
1998 1999
2000 2001
2002 2003
2004 2006
2007 2008
2009 2010
Top of page
|
|
2005
The Rise and Rise of Evolutionary Psychology
A Cafe Conversation at
The Battle of Ideas
Royal College of Art, Kensington Gore, London SW7
Saturday 29th October 2005
What lies behind the rise and rise of Evolutionary Psychology?
Does this reflect or inform the way we view ourselves?
One of the great triumphs of the late twentieth century was the
application of Darwinian theory to animal behaviour. This led
to many attempts to apply the same methods to human beings and
to explain the human mind in evolutionary terms. In the 1970s
sociobiologists attempted to explain human behaviour in terms
of adaptation and were accused of being reactionary and racist.
Yet since that period we have sociobiology's younger cousin Evolutionary
Psychology has come to the fore. Evolutionary Psychology attempts to
explain human nature exclusively in terms of evolved predispositions to
behave in certain ways. How does this differ from sociobiology?
What are the implications of this approach? What are its strengths and
weaknesses? Why has Evolutionary Psychology proved so popular when
sociobiology was rejected so ambivalently?
Chair: Dave O'Toole
with
Rita Carter, author Mapping the Mind,
Conciousness and
Caspar Hewett, The Great Debate
Top of page
Development, Sustainability and Environment
The Great Debate in association with
WORLDwrite and
the RSA
Saturday 15th October 2005
In the last 20 years environmental thinking has become very much a part of
our every day lives. The term 'sustainable development' has entered the
mainstream and is used to guide policy in both the developed and developing
world. Yet whilst we in the West enjoy a safe, clean, pleasant environment
coupled with high living standards the developing world is being discouraged
from aspiring to anything more than basic needs. So what is sustainable
development and what are its consequences? What is current in environmental
thought?
Combining a workshop on film training with a global edge, documentary
footage from Africa and the Middle East and a series of discussions this day
conference examined the relevance of
environmentalism in the new millenium and questioned whether development
to western standards is possible for the developing world.
Discussion sessions include Energy Futures,
Aspirations and keynote debate sponsored by the
RSA; What Future for Environmentalism?
Speakers include Sir Bernard Ingham, Keith Barnham, Ian Burdon,
Ceri Dingle, Geoff Parkin, Roger Higman, Viv Regan and
Tony Gilland
Click Here for further details
Click Here for proceedings
Top of page
The Nature of Being Human
The Great Debate in association with
Newcastle Philosophy Society
Part of Newcastle Science Festival 2005
Friday 18th March 2005, 7pm
What is that defines a human being? Is it a universal nature? Is it consciousness?
Is it our capacity for rational thought? Is it our ecological ability to adapt
our environment rather than adapt to it?
Can we rely on reason alone? What can we learn about ourselves through the
study of evolution? How do these considerations interrelate? Why is it so
popular to apply Neo-Darwinist principles to human behaviour and to society?
These questions and others were examined through a discussion of what it is
to be human with a panel of experts including
Colin Talbot, author The Paradoxical Primate,
Caspar Hewett, Chair, The Great Debate,
Inge Rebergen, Historian and philosopher,
Adam Bell, Kantian philosopher
Top of page
The Great Debate supports North East launch of acclaimed debating competition
The Great Debate hopes to involve more students in the region in public debate
through its support of the Institute of
Ideas' and Pfizer's Debating Matters
Competition.
Following its highly successful pilot year, the competition launched for the first
time in the North East this year. The Great Debate was a partner in the North East
region heat that took place at the University of Newcastle on Friday 18 March 2005.
Debating Matters demands more than rhetoric or rant from the sixth form students
who take part. Young people are encouraged to research issues thoroughly and become
more confident and sophisticated in articulating their views by standing up to a
probing intellectual examination. This is all part of the competition's philosophy
of privileging reasoned participation over rhetorical posturing.
Debate topics engage with contentious contemporary issues and uniquely involve a
critical examination of debater's arguments by celebrity judges drawn from the fields
of academia, the media and business.
The debate motions for the North East region heat included: 'Victims should be
more involved in the criminal justice system'; 'Conceptual art is not real art';
'Reducing pollution should be society's top priority'; and 'Human genetic engineering
is a step too far'.
The Great Debate's Caspar Hewett,
Dave O'Toole and Mo Lovatt
were judges for the North East region heat.
Click here
for further details about the competition
Top of page
The Great Debate: Being Human
A one day course run as part of Newcastle Science Festival 2005
Introduced by Caspar Hewett and
David Large
Saturday 12th March 2005, 9.30am -5.00pm
Bedson Teaching Centre
University of Newcastle
Do our genes influence our conscious experiences? Do they explain them? Is the
human mind something we can properly study? What can we learn about ourselves
through the study of mind from the perspective of evolution?
Since Darwin our vision of ourselves as a unique type of being has been
progressively undermined. What can recent theories related to evolutionary theory,
neurobiology and AI tell us about the experience of being human?
1998 1999
2000 2001
2002 2003
2005 2006
2007 2008
2009 2010
Top of page
|
|
2004
What can evolutionary theory tell us about the human mind?
One of the great triumphs of the late twentieth century was the application
of Darwinian theory to animal behaviour. This led to many attempts to apply
the same methods to human beings and to explain the human mind in evolutionary
terms. Thus we see the rise of the now common phrase ‘the gene for . . .’ in
describing human behaviour. One theory, Evolutionary Psychology, attempts to
explain the mind in terms of evolved predispositions to behave in certain ways.
The theory of the meme rejects the notion that genes are sufficient to explain
cultural evolution - especially in the light of the pace of cultural change. A
meme is a unit of cultural transmission or imitation.
Like the gene, which is a
self-replicating molecule, the meme is a replicator - when a meme is imitated
it has replicated itself. Meme theorists argue that human beings are determined
largely by social factors, not just by genetic code and that there is another
unit of selection at work - the meme. What both these approaches have in common
is the idea that the notion of natural selection, can lead to an understanding
of the human mind.
What are the strengths and weaknesses of these approaches? Why are some
theorists ambivalent about the explanatory value of genes and memes when it
comes to the mind? Is there something fundamental that an evolutionary approach
cannot provide?
Top of page
The Great Debate: Whatever Happened to the Subject?
Panel Discussion: Thursday 18th March 2004, 7-9pm
International Centre for Life, Times Square, Newcastle upon Tyne
Speakers:
Rita Carter,
James Heartfield,
Raymond Tallis
Chair: Caspar Hewett
Are we masters of our destiny?
Can we really influence the direction of change?
Since the Enlightenment the idea of the subject has had a central place
in thought about the special nature of humanity. This is a description of human
beings as active agents doing things for reasons and shaping the world to their
own ends. Yet, in recent years, fields as diverse as neuroscience, literary
criticism and Evolutionary Psychology have converged on a very different vision
of what we are. In the last twenty years we have been brought a vision of
humans as machines; zombies experiencing the illusion of choice and intentionality.
Why is this? Does this reflect a new understanding of what we really are or are
these interpretations more to do with the way we view ourselves today?
Click Here for proceedings
Top of page
Playing it Safe: Science and the Risk Society
Panel Discussion: Wednesday 17th March 2004
International Centre for Life, Times Square, Newcastle upon Tyne
Speakers: Roy Boyne, John Gillott,
Lynn Frewer,
Phil Macnaghten
Chair: David O'Toole
Is there a case for caution where the outcome of scientific
and technological advances is uncertain?
It is hard to believe that only a short time ago the benefits of scientific progress
were taken for granted. Yet today the tendency is to consider the risks whenever a new
technology is developed. The precautionary principle urges us to err on the side of
caution when knowledge is uncertain and to place a duty
of care on those who propose change. What are the consequences of this new way of
looking at the world? Can we benefit from science without taking risks?
What are the dangers of playing it safe?
Of Blank Slates and Zombies
(Modern Theories of Human Nature)
Day school: Saturday 13th March 2004
International Centre for Life, Times Square, Newcastle upon Tyne
Tutors: Caspar Hewett and David Large
Is there a universal human nature? If so, what defines it? Is it consciousness?
Is it our capacity for rational thought? Is it our ability to adapt our environment
rather than adapt to it? This one day course examined some modern ideas of what
human nature is and attempted to draw some conclusions about these questions.
1998 1999
2000 2001
2002
2004 2005
2006 2007
Top of page
|
|
2003
The Great Debate: Development, Sustainability and Environmentalism
A day of discussion held on Saturday 27th September, Newcastle Civic Centre
Sponsored by Peer Review for European Sustainable Urban
Development (PreSud)
Click Here for proceedings
In the last 20 years environmental thinking has become very
much a part of our every day lives. The term 'sustainable development' has
entered the mainstream and is used to guide policy in both the developed and
developing world.
Yet whilst we in the West enjoy a safe, clean, pleasant environment coupled
with high living
standards the developing world is being discouraged from aspiring to anything
more than basic needs.
So what is sustainable development and what are its consequences?
What is current in environmental thought?
This conference re-evaluated the relevance of environmentalism
in the 21st century, examining the intimate links between the concepts of
development, sustainability and environmentalism
and asking if development to western standards is possible for the developing world.
Speakers:
Derek Bell,
Leverhulme Research Fellow in Politics, University of Newcastle
Allen Creedy,
PreSud Project Director, Directorate of Enterprise,
Environment & Culture, Newcastle City Council
Ceri Dingle, Director,
WORLDwrite
James Heartfield,
editor
Sustaining Architecture in the Anti-Machine Age,
author
The 'Death of the Subject' Explained
Joe Kaplinsky, Technology Analyst
Mary Mellor,
author The
Politics of Money: Towards Sustainability and Economic Democracy
Geoff Parkin,
Lecturer, Sustainable Hydrology, Water
Resource Systems Research Laboratory
Jan Simmonds,
Christian Aid
North East
The Great Debate: What does it mean to be human?
Thursday 22nd May 2003, Newcastle Playhouse
Click here for proceedings
What does it mean to be human? Thoughts by Caspar Hewett
Do I Want To Be Like You? Notes by David Large
What level of communication is possible between humans and animals?
How much can the study of animals tell us about ourselves?
What does it mean to be human?
In 1967, Roger Fouts, a psychology student, began teaching American Sign
Language to a young chimpanzee called Washoe, beginning a relationship that has
continued for over 30 years.
The Chimp That Spoke is a production inspired by this story.
Acclaimed for their bold visceral theatre productions,
David Glass Ensemble present a
meditation on our closest animal relatives and explore what it is to be human.
The post-show discussion What does it mean to be human?
was organised by The Great Debate
in association with Northern Stage
and David Glass Ensemble
Chair: Mo Lovatt
Panel
David Glass, Artistic Director, David Glass Ensemble
Caspar Hewett, Chair, The Great Debate
Professor
John Burn, Institute of Human Genetics, International Centre for Life
David Large, The Great Debate
Top of page
The Great Debate: Is Anti-Americanism Xenophobic?
Wednesday 5th March, 10pm, Newcastle Playhouse Foyer/Bar
Click here for proceedings
A discussion convened by Mo Lovatt in association
with
The Ashton Group,
The Great Debate and
Northern Stage.
As part of Northern Stage's Colour season, this event looked at issues
raised by the play
Lockerbie 103, the
impact of US and British foreign policies and at attitudes towards
the impending war with Iraq.
Chair: Caspar Hewett
Speakers:
Ian Ferguson, journalist and co-author of
Cover up of Convenience: The Hidden Scandal of Lockerbie
Jon Bryan, Lecturer in Sociology, The Great Debate
Doug Henderson, MP
Peter Hetherington, Regional Affairs Editor, The Guardian
Rachel Ashton, Director, Lockerbie 103
Des Dillon, writer, Lockerbie 103
1998 1999
2000 2001
2003
2004 2005
2006 2007
Top of page
|
| 2001
The Great Debate -
Darwinism Today
A ten week course held September - December 2001
at Centre for
Lifelong Learning, University of Newcastle
Tutor: Caspar Hewett
The Great Debate in Action:
Minds, Genes and Consciousness
Day school held on Saturday 26 May 2001
Tutors: David Large
and Caspar Hewett
held at Centre for
Lifelong Learning, University of Newcastle
Do our genes influence our conscious experiences? Do they explain them? Is
the human mind something we can properly study? What can we learn about
ourselves through the study of mind from the perspective of evolution? Why has
it become popular to apply Neo-Darwinian principles to the philosophy of mind
and consciousness? This day school will examine the issues raised by these
questions through a study of evolutionary factors as applied to theories of
mind. A conception of natural consciousness will be formed.
The Great Debate: Evolution, Human Nature and Autonomy
Public debate held on Thursday 22nd March 2001 at
Department of
Social Policy and Sociology , University of Newcastle in association
with the Institute of Ideas.
Sponsored by Polity
Press and Weidenfeld and Nicolson
Speakers:
Christopher Badcock,
author Evolutionary Psychology: A Critical Introduction, Psychodarwinism:
The New Synthesis of Darwin and Freud
Rita Carter, author
Mapping the Mind
Kenan Malik, author
Man, Beast and Zombie, The Meaning of Race
Sue Scott, Professor
of Sociology, University of Durham
Chair:
Caspar Hewett
The opening of the twenty first century brings with it new knowledge about
our genes and our brains which promises a revolution in the way we view
ourselves. Alongside this knowledge is a tendency to view human nature in a
deterministic way.
Some argue that only the social sciences can answer questions about human
behaviour, while others argue that we are determined by our biology.
So where are the appropriate places to look if we want to understand human
nature? What are the implications for our ability to act as autonomous rational
individuals?
The Great Debate in Action:
Sexual Selection and Questions of Human Nature
Day school held on Saturday 27th January 2001,
Centre for Lifelong
Learning, Newcastle
Tutors: Caspar Hewett and
David Large
A hundred years ago Darwin revolutionised our understanding of the origin
of species. Since then the theory of evolution by natural and sexual selection
has become accepted wisdom. Earlier this century Social Darwinism was
discredited, yet in recent years it has again become popular to attempt to
explain society in Darwinian terms. At the same time theories abound suggesting
that humanity's evolutionary history and the genes we inherit determine our
behaviour. What does this convergence of natural and social theory represent?
This course investigates the theory of sexual selection and its application to
animal and human behaviour, focussing on the themes: determinism, choice,
ethics and responsibility.
1998 1999
2001
2002 2003
2004 2005
2006 2007
Top of page
|
| 2000
The Great Debate -
Darwinism Today
A ten week course held September - December 2000
at Centre for
Lifelong Learning, University of Newcastle
Tutor: Caspar Hewett
Determined to Survive? The Great Debate - Freedom, Determinism and the
Gene
Public debate held on Wednesday 21st June 2000 at
Centre for Lifelong
Learning , University of Newcastle in association with the
Institute of
Ideas.
Sponsored by Blackwell's
Speakers:
Christopher Badcock,
author Psychodarwinism: The New Synthesis of Darwin and Freud
Helene Guldberg ,
Associate Lecturer in Developmental Psychology, Open University
Matt Ridley , author
Genome, The Red Queen, The Origins of Virtue
Chair:
Caspar Hewett
How much influence do our genes have on our behaviour? Is human nature the
same for all societies? What can we learn about ourselves through the study of
evolution? What are the implications for our freedom? Why has it become popular
to apply Neo-Darwinist principles to human behaviour and to society? These
questions and others will be examined through a discussion of evolutionary
theory and genetics and their application to human behaviour.
The Great Debate - Philosophical Approaches to Darwinism
Day school held on Saturday 20th May 2000,
Centre for Lifelong
Learning , University of Newcastle
Tutors: David Large
and Caspar Hewett
A hundred years ago Darwin revolutionised our understanding of the origin
of species. Since then the theory of evolution by natural slection has become
accepted wisdom. But what does this mean? What can evolution explain and how
does it do that? This day school will interrogate recent evolutionary theory
and genetics and apply philosophical approaches to examine these questions.
2000 2001
2002 2003
2004 2005
2006 2007
Top of page
|
| 1998
The Great Debate - Biodiversity
Public discussion held on Thursday 29th October 1998 at
Centre for Lifelong
Learning, University of Newcastle
Introduced by: Caspar
Hewett and David Hall
What is biodiversity? Why should humanity
protect endangered species? Do they have intrinsic value? What effect could
species extinctions have on humanity?
The Great Debate -
Darwinism Today
Revised and run once each academic year. First run September - December 1998 at
Centre for Lifelong Learning, University of Newcastle
Tutor: Caspar Hewett
What is the selfish gene? What is the link between Darwinism and genetics
What can the study of evolution tell us about animal behaviour? What can we
learn about the origins of altruism through the study of evolution? Why are
there still disagreements within evolutionary theory today? These questions and
many others are examined through a study of recent evolutionary theory and
genetics and their application to animal behaviour.
Since the publication of Darwin's On The Origin of Species by Means of
Natural Selection in 1859 the theory of evolution by natural selection has
become accepted wisdom. Yet great debates are still taking place amongst
evolutionary theorists. This course looks at Darwinism and genetics and at the
disagreements within evolutionary theory today. The modern application of
Darwinism to animal behaviour is investigated.
The course consists of ten sessions during which the work of specific
authors and their ideas are introduced. Pair work, group work and class
discussion allow the students to develop arguments and gain confidence in
understanding the theories.
Principal texts
The Selfish Gene, Richard Dawkins, OUP, 1976
Darwin's Dangerous Idea, Daniel C. Dennett, Penguin, 1995
Reinventing Darwin: The Great Evolutionary Debate, Niles Eldredge,
Phoenix, 1995
Risk Conciousness and the Culture of Fear
Saturday 16th May 1998, Centre for Continuing Education, University of
Newcastle
One day workshop facilitated by Caspar Hewett
and Jon Bryan
Are we really at risk? Why has the 1990s been characterised by one
health panic after another? Why do new developments in fields such
as genetic engineering engender fear and suspicion? Why has safety
become the obsession of our era? What are the implications for the
future? In particular, of the worls is viewed through the prism of
risk, how can science and society move forwards?
Sustainability and the Promise of Factor Four
Saturday 31st January 1998, Centre for Continuing Education, University of
Newcastle
Tutors: Caspar Hewett and
David Hall
Is sustainable development a good thing? Twenty five years on
from Limits to Growth, the new report to the Club of Rome,
Factor Four - Doubling Wealth,
Halving Resource Use is essential reading for anyone interested in
sustainability. The book describes fifty exciting examples of new technologies
which could revolutionise our use of resources, allowing us to improve living
standards at the same time as decreasing our use of raw materials, fuels and
minerals. However, having assumed that limited resources represent the most
important challenge to humanity today, the authors go on to introduce the idea
of resource productivity as the new measure of progress. What does this
represent?
- Are there limited resources?
- What are the implications of constraining resource use?
This discussion will explore the themes developed in the report,
looking at the new technologies, examining the authors' sustainable agenda and
questioning some of the assumptions made in what promises to be one of the most
influential books of the decade.
Essential reading: Factor Four - Doubling Wealth, Halving Resource
Use, Ernst Von Weizsaker, Amory B Lovins, L Hunter Lovins, Earthscan 1997
The Great Debate - Evolution and Human Nature
January - March 1998, Centre for Continuing Education, University of Newcastle
Tutors: Caspar Hewett and
David Hall
A hundred years ago Darwin revolutionised our understanding of the origin of
species. Since then the theory of evolution by natural selection has become
accepted wisdom. Yet great debates are still taking place amongst evolutionary
theorists. Why is it then that prominent writers such as Richard Dawkins and
Stephen Jay Gould fail to agree?
Earlier this century Social Darwinism was discredited, yet in recent years
it has again become popular to explain society in Darwinian terms. At the same
time theories abound suggesting that humanity's evolutionary history and the
genes we inherit determine our behaviour. What does this convergence of natural
and social theory represent?
This course will look at Darwinism and genetics and at the disagreements
within evolutionary theory today. The modern application of Darwinism to
society and to human behaviour will be investigated and reasons sought for the
renewed popularity of this approach. The course will consist of ten sessions
during which the work of specific authors and their ideas will be introduced.
Pair work, group work and class discussion will allow the students to develop
arguments and gain confidence in understanding the theories and the context in
which they have become prevalent.
1998 1999
2000 2001
2002 2003
2004 2005
2006 2007
Top of page
|
|