Reaching for the Sky
by Laura-Jay Turnbull
Review of a debate held as part of Newcastle
Science Festival 2007
Click here for proceedings of the debate
Click here for printer friendly version of this page
Click here for full details of event
Ian Abley, architect, project manager
John Thackara, design producer, Director of
Doors of Perception
Dr Sean Wilkinson,
Senior Lecturer in Structural Engineering,
The great megastructures debate - well it was certainly thought provoking!
The debate commenced with the three speakers who all had something profound and
intellectual to say about megastructures.
The first debate that caught my attention was Sean Wilkinson's "What you can buy for
£50 pounds?" - Erm nothing as far as land is concerned, or nothing worthwile anyway,
would be my answer to that. Maybe people build upwards
because land is expensive and it is seen as more economically viable to do this.
I liked the point that larger height is more about egos than economies.
I can certainly picture footballers and other rich people living in those buildings
just to be pretentious and show off their wealth and status. The most wealthy will
pay a premium for these places, but it is questionable how long the trend will last
and the market may collapse.
Another point which caught my attention was the argument over horizontal versus
vertical sprawls. Are we to build "upwards or outwards?" Personally I am no great
fan of skyscrapers; I think I would feel claustraphobic if I lived in one.
They cost too much money anyway. I mm more in the "let's build outwards" camp.
My favourite part of the evening was when the audience were asked their opinion of the debate.
I felt that the most interesting point made throughout the whole thing was when someone
said "Noone ever asks the slugs and the snails if they want to move." The participant may not
have articulated his point well (making it sound as if the slugs could answer the question),
but the point made was a serious one considering the environment.
When destroying animal's habitats and wildlife in general mankind never really thinks
about the consequences of such actions. We are dependent on other
organisms too such as trees for oxygen. It is arrogant to imply that we don't need nature or
such habitats because we do. The point that "We never ask the monkeys" was equally poorly
expressed, but you can understand the sentiments behind
the rhetoric in so far as we do need to consider how man made structures effect the natural
environment. All in all the megastructures debate is something that needs to be looked at
and thought about carefully as building such
megastructures has consequences and a real effect on our planet.
Reported By Laura-Jay Turnbull
Top of page